D&D 5E has a sweet spot.

D&D 5th edition arguably has a sweet spot. Levels 5-10 is where 5E really clicks in my opinion. Wizards design team has even stated that in their surveys most players rarely play above level 10. Campaigns usually fizzle out at or before 10th level. Most if not all of wizard's campaigns take place within levels 5 and 10. I personally feel the only reason they kept levels above ten was because it's part of D&D legacy.

I've personally never been a fan of high power levels in high level play. I would rather a dragon always be a fearsome beast and a group of goblins always have a chance of over running the party. I guess that is why options like Epic 6 always had an appeal to me. Capping off hit points and combat bonuses so games never turn into fantasy super heroes is very appealing to me.

On the low end of leveling wizards has really streamlined and made the first three levels of the game into an express way. Again I feel like wizards felt level 3 should be the real starting level, but kept levels one and two for legacy reasons.

I have a real urge to rework the basic game to limit it to 6 or 10 levels. Keep all the class features but shuffle them into those levels yet limit hit points and proficiency bonuses. Expect this in a future post.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Critical hits.

Nothing is more dramatic in D&D than rolling a critical hit. The die rolls a 20 and everyone gets all excited. The players picks up his damage dice,  grabbing extra dice ready roll that double damage. The player let's loose and rolls snake eyes. The lowest possible roll. We decided this just wouldn't do. Our rule is the first damage die is always maximum. For example 6 on a D6. The second die is rolled as normal and added to the 6. For example if the damage die was a D8 the player would roll 1D8+8 (plus any bonuses). No matter what that D8 rolls its exceptional, because even a roll of 1 is greater than the weapons normal maximum.
Read more

Sandbox vs railroad in role-playing games.

One topic that comes up especially in D&D circles is the railroad v.s. Sandbox styles of DMing. Most any time these terms are used it's to point out the superiority of one or the other. I would like to propose that not just are they both totally valid, they should be thought of as being useful together. My average game is a mix of both elements. I would like to better define what I mean by these two terms. whenever most people say a game or adventure is a railroad style game thy mean the game is set on a path. The plot is linear and travels from point to point without deviation, like a train on it's rails. The players talk to an NPC who sends them to a location, the location has clues that send the players to another location. Everything is planned out and the game moves along the points to advance the story. Most premade adventures and campaigns are railroad style games. A sandbox adventure on the other hand is an open world. The players are set down in it and can fol...
Read more